Talk:3rd Army Corps (Russia)

Military history: Russian & Soviet / Post-Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Russia

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

BearPawZ.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:22, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tactical sign[edit]

3rd corps has the symbol "O in an upside down triangle" and not the bear paw one. In fact, I've never seen the bear paw one used at all Shhssh (talk) 12:34, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

6th MRD reformed?[edit]

The Ukrainian General Staff said in January that a reconstituted 6th Motor Rifle Division, under the 3rd AC, was training in Belarus. I haven't found what I consider to be good enough RS/details on this, so I haven't mentioned it yet.

RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 04:20, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should this article include a section containing unverified claims by the opposing side in an active conflict?[edit]

The Ukrainian General Staff is not a neutral third party, and they definitely aren't a reliable source on the morale of an army unit they are currently at war with. The fact that their press releases are quoted as fact by David Axe in Forbes does not make them an acceptable source of information on this topic.

I'm removing the section on morale until someone can produce more appropriate sources. Toadchavay (talk) 08:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]