Talk:Global energy crisis (2021–present)

On 9 October 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from 2021 Global Energy Crisis to 2021 Global energy crisis. The result of the discussion was moved to 2021 global energy crisis.

Requested move 9 October 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to 2021 global energy crisis. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:59, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Global Energy Crisis → 2021 Global energy crisis – does not meet criteria for capitalization. Legendary Whistler 5 (talk) 20:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move to 2021 global energy crisis (or 2021 energy crisis: do we need "global"?) No need for the cap on "Global". Of the references, only Bloomberg uses the exact phrase, and even then only in the headline: where it's capitalised per house style. Google ngrams show a clear preference for the lowercase term. cf. 1973 oil crisis, 1979 oil crisis, energy crisis. We haven't a page Global energy crisis, so strictly we don't need to disambiguate by year, but since the oil crises of the 1970s were multinational and affected other forms of energy derived from oil, it's probably reasonably to keep it. 85.67.32.244 (talk) 10:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 04:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move per IP. ― Qwerfjkl talk 20:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move per request Thingofme (talk) 01:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to 2021 global energy crisis. All lower case. Although at the moment it's hardly worthy to survive AfD. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Incorrect data in image[edit]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:European_Countries_Dependent_On_Russian_Natural_Gas.webp

Bulgaria is a part of the European Union unlike the existing data. Amitwik1i (talk) 12:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

French nuclear power failure[edit]

Nuclear power in France is down to about 50% after several plants failed due to corrosion. Repairs will take months or years. Why was this obvious problem omitted? Matthead Discuß 18:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What was French nuclear output in 2023? 2001:A62:1526:F902:5C89:D022:D4CE:E6AC (talk) 21:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Russo-Ukrainian (what?)[edit]

Since there is no official declaring war to each other from the both sides, I insist on the definition «military conflict», this is what's really going on. Also «Rosso» is correlating more to culture, language, not to the certain country, so better is «Russia-Ukraine». Владимир Казаринов (talk) 07:07, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure so the Vietnam war, the Gulf war, the war in Iraq, or the war in Afghanistan were not wars either then everyone is squeaky clean! 193.196.193.50 (talk) 13:58, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's a matter of definition, at what scale should a military conflict enlarge to become a «war»? Undoubtful criteria is a general mobilization, which is, as I know, didn't take place in all that cases, in current Russian-Ukranian too. In media, headlines mode they say «a war», but we're in encyclopedia mode, which means objectivity. Sides could be far from squeaky cleanness even in a street fight, not a criteria at all. Владимир Казаринов (talk) 16:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is a war in Ukraine. Definitelly. --Mats33 (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit info[edit]

Hi! I am planning to add a rather substantial amount of information to this page, using among other things information and statistics from this IEA webpage. I think that this would improve the quality of the page quite a lot, but want to inform about it here first, if any of you would have any other thoughts. Thanks! EnergyAnalyst2 (talk) 15:24, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Global?"[edit]

Basically the entire article is about europe. Title should be changed to European or information about the rest of the world actually added. Bomberswarm2 (talk) 06:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear power[edit]

This article mentions the word "nuclear" only once (in relation to the rounding error of power that was lost at some French reactors due to high temperatures). Of course there were other issues with French nuclear in 2022 but the article doesn't mention them, either.

Meanwhile the article nowhere mentions this or various national policy decisions of a similar nature. Nor does the word "uranium" appear once in the article - even though oil, coal and gas do numerous times.?. 2001:A62:1526:F902:5C89:D022:D4CE:E6AC (talk) 21:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]