Talk:2012 Maryland Question 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How does Maryland's veto referendum work?[edit]

It isn't clear how the "veto referendum" process works in Maryland. Does it require a majority of voters to uphold the legislature's same-sex marriage bill (which I believe is the case in Washington state), or does it require a majority of voters to rescind it? Big difference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.111.254.17 (talk) 13:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Answer[edit]

How the veto referendum works in Maryland is simple and straightforward. The question presented on your ballot will ask whether you approve of a law that has been passed in the legislature (Civil Marriage Protection Act), and it will have a simple description of what the law does (allow same-sex couples to obtain a state civil marriage license).

  • FOR = you want to keep the law
  • AGAINST = you want to repeal (veto) the law

The majority on either side will be the decider on the question, whether yes or no. – ツ Teammm (talk · email) 16:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If what you're saying is accurate, then if 49% vote for the law and 45 percent vote against it (with 6% choosing not to vote at all on this issue), then the law is effectively vetoed. In other words, opponents of same-sex marriage don't need a majority to vote against it, they just need to keep a majority from voting FOR it (i.e., a non-vote is the same as a no-vote). Is this correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.111.254.17 (talk) 17:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is not correct. The law will pass if a majority of the people who vote on Question 6 vote in favor of it, and will fail if a majority of the people who vote on Question 6 vote against it. People who vote on other races but don't vote on Question do not have their votes counted. --Jfruh (talk) 03:40, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming to Maryland Question 6 (2012)[edit]

Good! Hekerui (talk) 19:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clarity / Flow[edit]

"Support and Opposition" seems a bit densely constructed, with many links competing for a small amount of real estate. Would it be better from a readability / flow standpoint to sectionalize these contributors into groups comprised of sequential lists of similar people / entities? Elcid89 (talk) 08:38, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it looked cluttered. I fixed it. Hopefully, it's more readable. Teammm talk
email 22:28, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • That looks great. Well done and thanks! Elcid89 (talk) 03:45, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Great. Thank you! Teammm talk
email 04:12, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why are there so many invalid/blank votes?[edit]

It shows over 1 million blank and invalid votes that is a ton. They aren't from people voting from president because the number voting for president and the valid votes are very similar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.178.25 (talk) 18:04, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You were right. I updated the chart with the correct total number of votes cast in the 2012 election. Thank you! Teammm talk
email 04:10, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Maryland Question 6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:13, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Came here by accident[edit]

This page is a redirect from Question 6.

I came to this page by accident, looking for additional information on the topic of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y30VF3cSIYQ

Maybe at the top of the page, there could be a "For the mathematical problem, see Vieta jumping." If not a full disambiguation page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.133.116 (talk) 18:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Maryland Question 6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2012_Maryland_Question_6&oldid=1196618236"