Talk:1870 Atlantic hurricane season

1870 Atlantic hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 5, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:1870 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 02:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 18:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Worth linking Atlantic hurricane anywhere before "See also"?

Done--12george1 (talk) 03:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"In 2011, the Atlantic hurricane reanalysis project did not add any new systems during their review of the 1870 season. However, reanalysis by José Fernández-Partagás and Henry F. Diaz in 1995 led to the inclusion of seven previously undocumented tropical cyclones – the second, third, fifth, seventh, eighth, tenth, and eleventh storms." - these should be flipped IMO, so the first reanalysis in 1995 talks about the undocumented storms, and then the 2011 reanalysis.

Done--12george1 (talk) 03:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"October became the most active month of the season, with six known storms forming. The last of which, the eleventh storm of 1870, was last encountered by ships in the southeastern Gulf of Mexico on November 3." - I suggest switching "which" to "these" for grammar purposes

Done--12george1 (talk) 03:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"In Cuba, the combination of sustained high winds, intensive rainfall, and two rivers, the San Juan and the Yumuri, bursting their banks destroyed the city of Matanzas and caused the loss of some 800 lives." - I think this is a bit much for one sentence, starting off the impact paragraph. I italicized the part that stood out grammatically

Better?--12george1 (talk) 03:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The nearby city of Cárdenas also reported major damage to warehouses and wharves and the destruction of several dwellings, with many more losing their roofs and otherwise suffering damage. - too many "and"s IMO

Better?--12george1 (talk) 03:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What was the basis for Chenoweth estimating Cat 5 intensity for the one Cuba hurricane? Pressure? Surge?

Seems to be because the storm apparently having a peripheral pressure of 914 mbar --12george1 (talk) 03:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it worth linking "bark" to barque? (the type of ship)

Wikilinked to bark (sound) :P --12george1 (talk) 03:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is in good shape, so I don't think any of the above should be too difficult to address. @12george1: let me know if you have any questions. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]