This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
The first paragraph of the lede has a dead reference. I'm not sure how to remove it without causing damage. Would someone more computer savvy than I am please do so. Also, I updated the currency conversion rate and added a date. American In Brazil (talk) 12:14, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's very non neutral to refer to the city as a dystopia, this should be mediated somehow — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.189.132.164 (talk) 06:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
this appears to have found its way here by mistake "Sketch of the city of Vera Cruz done by the Commission of Location of the New Federal Capital in 1954 [why?]" --probably because the caption contains the word "plano". It is important to realize that in this case it means map. There are places in the article where it is difficult to translate something to do with the axiometry and it would be nice if a Portuguese architect looked at that Elinruby (talk) 03:55, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This turns out to be the cross that took possession back in the first plan, I think. Do not remove.
other translator issue: "scheme" is usually something clever but definitely wrong in English. In Portuguese it can be used in a neutral way to describe a plan project that involves cooperation. I believe that is the intended meaning in the lede of this article and if nobody objects will change it to "project" Elinruby (talk) 04:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
in Romance languages "important" as used at the end of the Demographics section usually means "large". This should be verified, referenced and fixedElinruby (talk) 04:13, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=link}