User talk:Headbomb: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Headbomb/Archives/2024/March) (bot |
→AAlertBot: Updating article alerts failure: new section Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
:{{para|url-status|live}} serves no purpose when there is no {{para|archive-url}} present. See [[Help:Citation_Style_1#Web_archives]].  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> 15:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC) |
:{{para|url-status|live}} serves no purpose when there is no {{para|archive-url}} present. See [[Help:Citation_Style_1#Web_archives]].  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> 15:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
== AAlertBot: Updating article alerts failure == |
|||
[[User:AAlertBot|AAlertBot]]'s task "Updating article alerts" failed to run per the configuration specified at [[Wikipedia:Bot activity monitor/Configurations]]. Detected only 0 edits in the last 1 day, whereas at least 10 were expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. <small>If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the [[Wikipedia:Bot activity monitor/Configurations|task configuration]] instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the {{para|notify}} parameter from the {{tlx|/task|nolink=y}} template.</small> Thanks! – ''[[User:SDZeroBot|SDZeroBot]]'' ([[User talk:SDZeroBot|talk]]) 07:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:20, 10 April 2024
User | Talk | Archives | My work | Sandbox | Resources | News | Stats |
---|
|
|
Category:Hurricane season button templates has been nominated for renaming
Category:Hurricane season button templates has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Noah, AATalk 11:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Can you help?
I am in a quandary. I'm working on an article for Doreen Othero which has a weird message. It says the OCLC number is incorrect on the last one of her works in the "selected works" section, but it isn't. Per worldcat it is 10146270069, which is what is input. I typed it character by character so I don't think there could be any hidden code, but I am baffled as to why this is happening. Perhaps you or a page stalker with more technical expertise can fix the problem? I appreciate your magic. SusunW (talk) 16:31, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Likely the OCLC limit was hit. It'll resolve itself as soon as someone gets to it. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Hurricane season bar gap
Template:Hurricane season bar gap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Noah, AATalk 21:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Clarifying "predatory source" revision on Acinetobacter baylyi
Hello, @Headbomb
Thank you for looking over the Acinetobacter baylyi article, I am new to working on Wikipedia. Could you please clarify what it means for a source to be considered "predatory" and how to recognize that? Additionally, the citation was removed from the end of the "aminoglycosides" paragraph, but the original citation shows up later with a citation of a similar article (it seems there is a common mentor and research location) at the end of the "chloramphenicol" paragraph. I am guessing that those pieces of information and associated citations would also need to be replaced and/or additionally supported by other (non-predatory) sources?
Thank you for your advice and assistance for a student, it is much appreciated. Mgcorn5051 (talk) 04:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Pharmacognosy Communications is published by the same people who publish Pharmacognosy Reviews, a group that brands itself EManuscript Technologies (which really are PhCog.net), and that general publishes low-quality herbal medicine research. Predatory might be a bit too harsh, but it's definitely not a high quality source required for medical claims (see WP:MEDRS).
Question re: url-status=live
Hello @Headbomb I just saw your edit on the article Craft Centre of Great Britain. I started my Wiki journey by copying some citation links and the "URL-status=live" was part of the chain I copied. Never knew what it was for, but thought it was just 'necessary'. Should I just delete this bit going forwards, please? Thanks 1.64.66.117 (talk) 14:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
|url-status=live
serves no purpose when there is no|archive-url=
present. See Help:Citation_Style_1#Web_archives. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
AAlertBot: Updating article alerts failure
AAlertBot's task "Updating article alerts" failed to run per the configuration specified at Wikipedia:Bot activity monitor/Configurations. Detected only 0 edits in the last 1 day, whereas at least 10 were expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the task configuration instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the |notify=
parameter from the {{/task}}
template. Thanks! – SDZeroBot (talk) 07:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)