Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Naming conventions of constituencies: Removing request for arbitration: declined by the Committee
Tag: Replaced
Line 7: Line 7:
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}}
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}}
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>

== Naming conventions of constituencies ==
'''Initiated by ''' [[User:امین اکبر|Ameen Akbar]] ([[User talk:امین اکبر|talk]]) '''at''' 16:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

=== Involved parties ===
<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator -->
*{{userlinks|امین اکبر}}, ''filing party''
*{{userlinks|Saad Ali Khan Pakistan}}

;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. -->
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASaad_Ali_Khan_Pakistan&diff=prev&oldid=1148670835&diffmode=source diff of notification Saad Ali Khan Pakistan]

;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried
I have tried to solve is issue in very polite manner. Admins can see the discussion pages, linked below.
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pakistani politics#Naming conventions of constituencies]]
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pakistani politics#RfC about Naming conventions of constituencies]]

=== Statement by امین اکبر ===
In my opinion constituencies, page titles should be as per the official name of the Election Commission of Pakistan. While another user is redirecting the old page to a new constituency which was created after delimitation without consulting or notifying other concerned editors. I and other users agreed to remove the area name from the title and keep it just numbers, but Mr. Saad Ali Khan want to impose his own wish on all pages. See the discussion [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pakistani politics]] to understand the matter.

=== Statement by Saad Ali Khan Pakistan ===
Hello
FIrst of all, I updated constituency pages as of 2022 Delimitations. When I saw talk pages of constituencies there was no one to talk to and when I completed updating constituency pages. person named ameen akbar came out and started to argue. He is just making this a so-called dispute. If you see his contributions he has done nothing to improve Pakistani pages on Wikipedia. If you visit and see Urdu version of Wikipedia where he is admin, everyone can see Urdu Wikipedia is in worst condition and don't have quality content. It takes months for just review new article.

He is just making false blame that I am imposing my wish on Wikipedia. I even told him and others that my intention is just to update Pakistani pages on Wikipedia like Indian, American and other countries etc but he is still arguing and misguiding people.
Constituency pages names are same as named by ECP (Please visit [[PP-1 Attock-I]]) but he still argues and showing this as dispute among others. Because of people like him, Pakistani pages are outdated and lack quality data.

===Statement by Robert McClenon (Naming Dispute)===
It isn't clear from reading this case request whether there is a conduct dispute at all. When I first saw that the case involved [[Pakistan]], which is a [[WP:CTOPICS|contentious topic]], I had two questions. First, is another [[Pakistan]] case needed to review the restrictions and enforcement regime? Second, is [[WP:AE|Arbitration Enforcement]] needed because of [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]] in a contentious area? The answers are no, and no.

This appears to be a situation where an editor knows that he wants assistance, and doesn't have a clue where to get assistance, and knows that there is an ArbCom. The filing party started an RFC on the naming of constituencies about a week ago. The best course of action at this point is to let the RFC run for the remainder of the 30 days, and to advise the filing editor to be patient.
[[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 04:24, 8 April 2023 (UTC)


=== Statement by {Non-party} ===
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * -->

=== Naming conventions of constituencies: Clerk notes ===
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).''
*

=== Naming conventions of constituencies: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/6/0> ===
{{anchor|1=Naming conventions of constituencies: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)</small>
* '''Decline''' as premature. Please review the other [[WP:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] avenues available to you. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 17:46, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
* '''Decline''' per Izno. [[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]] ([[User talk:GeneralNotability|talk]]) 18:59, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
*'''Decline''' per Izno. [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 10:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
*'''Decline''' I think we should have just quick removed this, but I guess we can do it the old fashioned way too. [[User:CaptainEek|<b style="color:#6a1f7f">CaptainEek</b>]] <sup>[[User talk:CaptainEek|<i style="font-size:82%; color:#a479e5">Edits Ho Cap'n!</i>]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/CaptainEek|⚓]] 02:41, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
* '''Decline''' [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 06:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
* '''Decline''' [[User:SilkTork|SilkTork]] ([[User talk:SilkTork|talk]]) 08:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:01, 10 April 2023

Requests for arbitration