This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2013)
In music theory, a diatonic scale is any heptatonic scale that includes five whole steps (whole tones) and two half steps (semitones) in each octave, in which the two half steps are separated from each other by either two or three whole steps, depending on their position in the scale. This pattern ensures that, in a diatonic scale spanning more than one octave, all the half steps are maximally separated from each other (i.e. separated by at least two whole steps).
The seven pitches of any diatonic scale can also be obtained by using a chain of six perfect fifths. For instance, the seven natural pitch classes that form the C-major scale can be obtained from a stack of perfect fifths starting from F:
Any sequence of seven successive natural notes, such as C–D–E–F–G–A–B, and any transposition thereof, is a diatonic scale. Modern musical keyboards are designed so that the white-key notes form a diatonic scale, though transpositions of this diatonic scale require one or more black keys. A diatonic scale can be also described as two tetrachords separated by a whole tone. In musical set theory, Allen Forte classifies diatonic scales as set form 7–35.
The term diatonic originally referred to the diatonic genus, one of the three genera of the ancient Greeks, and comes from Ancient Greek: διατονικός, romanized: diatonikós, of uncertain etymology. Most likely, it refers to the intervals being "stretched out" in that tuning, in contrast to the other two genera (chromatic and enharmonic).
This article does not concern alternative seven-note scales such as the harmonic minor or the melodic minor which, although sometimes called "diatonic", do not fulfill the condition of maximal separation of the semitones indicated above.
Western music from the Middle Ages until the late 19th century (see common practice period) is based on the diatonic scale and the unique hierarchical relationships created by this system of organizing seven notes.
Canadian musicologist Bob Fink concluded from his analysis of the 45,000-year-old Divje Babe flute that it "could produce four notes ... of a minor diatonic scale" and that this suggests human perception of "what constitutes harmony is at least partly hard wired".
Evidence that the Sumerians and Babylonians used a version of the diatonic scale is found in cuneiform inscriptions that contain both musical compositions and a tuning system. Despite the conjectural nature of reconstructions of the Hurrian songs, the diatonic nature of the tuning system is demonstrated by the fact that it involves a series of six perfect fifths, which is a recipe for the construction of a diatonic scale.
The 9,000-year-old flutes found in Jiahu, China, indicate the evolution over 1,200 years of flutes having 4, 5 and 6 holes to having 7 and 8 holes, the latter exhibiting striking similarity to diatonic hole spacings and sounds.
The scales corresponding to the medieval church modes were diatonic. Depending on which of the seven notes of the diatonic scale you use as the beginning, the positions of the intervals fall at different distances from the starting tone (the "reference note"), producing seven different scales. One of these, the one starting on B, has no pure fifth above its reference note (B–F is a diminished fifth): it is probably for this reason that it was not used. Of the six remaining scales, two were described as corresponding to two others with a B♭ instead of a B♮:
- A–B–C–D–E–F–G–A was described as D–E–F–G–A–B♭–C–D (the modern Aeolian modes whose reference notes are A and D, respectively, corresponding to the Aeolian modes of C major and F major, respectively)
- C–D–E–F–G–A–B–C was described as F–G–A–B♭–C–D–E–F (the modern Ionian modes whose reference notes are C and F, respectively, corresponding to the Ionian modes of C major and F major, respectively).
As a result, medieval theory described the church modes as corresponding to four diatonic scales only (two of which had the variable B♮/♭). They were the modern Dorian, Phrygian, Lydian, and Mixolydian modes of C major, plus the Aeolian and Ionian modes of F major when B♭ was substituted into the Dorian and Lydian modes of C major, respectively.
Heinrich Glarean considered that the modal scales including a B♭ had to be the result of a transposition. In his Dodecachordon, he not only described six "natural" diatonic scales (still neglecting the seventh one with a diminished fifth above the reference note), but also six "transposed" ones, each including a B♭, resulting in the total of twelve scales that justified the title of his treatise. These were the 6 non-Locrian modes of C major and F major.
By the beginning of the Baroque period, the notion of the musical key was established, describing additional possible transpositions of the diatonic scale. Major and minor scales came to dominate until at least the start of the 20th century, partly because their intervallic patterns are suited to the reinforcement of a central triad. Some church modes survived into the early 18th century, as well as appearing in classical and 20th-century music, and jazz (see chord-scale system).
Of Glarean's six natural scales, three have a major third/first triad: (Ionian, Lydian, and Mixolydian), and three have a minor one: Dorian, Phrygian, and Aeolian). To these may be added the seventh diatonic scale, with a diminished fifth above the reference note, the Locrian scale. These could be transposed not only to include one flat in the signature (as described by Glarean), but to all twelve notes of the chromatic scale, resulting in a total of eighty-four diatonic scales.
- improving the consonances, mainly the thirds, by providing a major third on each degree;
- allowing all twelve transpositions described above;
- and helping musicians to find their bearings on the keyboard.
The pattern of elementary intervals forming the diatonic scale can be represented either by the letters T (Tone) and S (Semitone) respectively. With this abbreviation, major scale, for instance, can be represented as
The major scale or Ionian mode is one of the diatonic scales. It is made up of seven distinct notes, plus an eighth that duplicates the first an octave higher. The pattern of seven intervals separating the eight notes is T–T–S–T–T–T–S. In solfège, the syllables used to name each degree of the scale are Do–Re–Mi–Fa–Sol–La–Ti–Do. A sequence of successive natural notes starting from C is an example of major scale, called C-major scale.
|Notes in C major:||C||D||E||F||G||A||B||C|
|Degrees in solfège:||Do||Re||Mi||Fa||Sol||La||Ti||Do|
The eight degrees of the scale are also known by traditional names, especially when used in a tonal context:
Natural minor scale
For each major scale, there is a corresponding natural minor scale, sometimes called its relative minor. It uses the same sequence of notes as the corresponding major scale but starts from a different note. That is, it begins on the sixth degree of the major scale and proceeds step-by-step to the first octave of the sixth degree. A sequence of successive natural notes starting from A is an example of a natural minor scale, called the A natural minor scale.
|Notes in A minor:||A||B||C||D||E||F||G||A|
The degrees of the natural minor scale, especially in a tonal context, have the same names as those of the major scale, except the seventh degree, which is known as the subtonic because it is a whole step below the tonic. The term leading tone is generally reserved for seventh degrees that are a half step (semitone) below the tonic, as is the case in the major scale.
Besides the natural minor scale, five other kinds of scales can be obtained from the notes of a major scale, by simply choosing a different note as the starting note. All these scales meet the definition of diatonic scale.
The whole collection of diatonic scales as defined above can be divided into seven different scales.
As explained above, all major scales use the same interval sequence T–T–S–T–T–T–S. This interval sequence was called the Ionian mode by Glarean. It is one of the seven modern modes. From any major scale, a new scale is obtained by taking a different degree as the tonic. With this method it is possible to generate six other scales or modes from each major scale. Another way to describe the same result would be to consider that, behind the diatonic scales, there exists an underlying diatonic system which is the series of diatonic notes without a reference note; assigning the reference note in turn to each of the seven notes in each octave of the system produces seven diatonic scales, each characterized by a different interval sequence:
|Mode||Also known as||Starting note relative
to major scale
|Interval sequence||Example with white keys||Example with tonic C|
|Aeolian||Natural minor scale||VI||T–S–T–T–S–T–T||A–B–C–D–E–F–G–A||C–D–E♭–F–G–A♭–B♭–C|
The first column examples shown above are formed by natural notes (i.e. neither sharps nor flats, also called "white-notes", as they can be played using the white keys of a piano keyboard). However, any transposition of each of these scales (or of the system underlying them) is a valid example of the corresponding mode. In other words, transposition preserves mode. This is shown in the second column, with each mode transposed to start on C.
The whole set of diatonic scales is commonly defined as the set composed of these seven natural-note scales, together with all of their possible transpositions. As discussed elsewhere, different definitions of this set are sometimes adopted in the literature.
Diatonic scales and tetrachords
- [C–D–E–F] – [G–A–B–C]
each tetrachord being formed of two tones and a semitone, T–T–S,
and the natural minor of A would be:
- [A–B–C–D] – [E–F–G–A]
formed two different tetrachords, the first consisting in a semitone between two tones, T–S–T, and the second of a semitone and two tones, S–T–T.
The medieval conception of the tetrachordal structure, however, was based on one single tetrachord, that of the D scale,
- [D–E–F–G] – [A–B–C–D]
each formed of a semitone between tones, T–S–T. It viewed other diatonic scales as differently overlapping disjunct and conjunct tetrachords:
- E scale: E–F–G | A–B–C–D = D–E
- F scale: F–G | A–B–C–D = D–E–F
- G scale: G | A–B–C–D = D–E–F–G
- A scale: A–B–C–D = D–E–F–G | A
- B scale: B–C–D = D–E–F–G | A–B
- C scale: C–D = D–E–F–G | A–B–C
(where G | A indicates the disjunction of tetrachords, always between G and A, and D = D indicates their conjunction, always on the common note D).
Diatonic scales can be tuned variously, either by iteration of a perfect or tempered fifth, or by a combination of perfect fifths and perfect thirds (Just intonation), or possibly by a combination of fifths and thirds of various sizes, as in well temperament.
Iteration of the fifth
If the scale is produced by the iteration of six perfect fifths, for instance F–C–G–D–A–E–B, the result is Pythagorean tuning:
|bring into main octave||4⁄3||1⁄1||3⁄2||9⁄8||27⁄16||81⁄64||243⁄128|
|sort into note order||C||D||E||F||G||A||B||C'|
|interval above C||1⁄1||9⁄8||81⁄64||4⁄3||3⁄2||27⁄16||243⁄128||2⁄1|
|interval between notes||9⁄8||9⁄8||256⁄243||9⁄8||9⁄8||9⁄8||256⁄243|
This tuning dates to Ancient Mesopotamia (see Music of Mesopotamia § Music theory), and was done by alternating ascending fifths with descending fourths (equal to an ascending fifth followed by a descending octave), resulting in the notes of a pentatonic or heptatonic scale falling within an octave.
Six of the "fifth" intervals (C–G, D–A, E–B, F–C', G–D', A–E') are all 3⁄2 = 1.5 (701.955 cents), but B–F' is the discordant tritone, here 729⁄512 = 1.423828125 (611.73 cents). Tones are each 9⁄8 = 1.125 (203.91 cents) and diatonic semitones are 256⁄243 ≈ 1.0535 (90.225 cents).
Extending the series of fifths to eleven fifths would result into the Pythagorean chromatic scale.
Equal temperament is the division of the octave in twelve equal semitones. The frequency ratio of the semitone then becomes the twelfth root of two (12√ ≈ 1.059463, 100 cents). The tone is the sum of two semitone. Its ratio is the sixth root of two (6√ ≈ 1.122462, 200 cents). Equal temperament can be produced by a succession of tempered fifths, each of them with the ratio of 27⁄12 ≈ 1.498307, 700 cents.
The fifths could be tempered more than in equal temperament, in order to produce better thirds. See quarter-comma meantone for a meantone temperament commonly used in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and sometimes after, which produces perfect major thirds.
Just intonation often is represented using Leonhard Euler's Tonnetz, with the horizontal axis showing the perfect fifths and the vertical axis the perfect major thirds. In the Tonnetz, the diatonic scale in just intonation appears as follows:
F–A, C–E and G–B, aligned vertically, are perfect major thirds; A–E–B and F–C–G–D are two series of perfect fifths. The notes of the top line, A, E and B, are lowered by the syntonic comma, 81⁄80, and the "wolf" fifth D–A is too narrow by the same amount. The tritone F–B is 45⁄32 ≈ 1.40625.
This tuning has been first described by Ptolemy and is known as Ptolemy's intense diatonic scale. It was also mentioned by Zarlino in the 16th century and has been described by theorists in the 17th and 18th centuries as the "natural" scale.
|interval between notes||9⁄8||10⁄9||16⁄15||9⁄8||10⁄9||9⁄8||16⁄15|
- Circle of fifths text table
- Diatonic and chromatic
- History of music
- Musical acoustics
- Piano key frequencies
- Prehistoric music
- "Random Samples". Science. 276 (5310): 203–205. April 1997. Archived from the original on 1 October 2007. Retrieved 7 March 2007.
- Kilmer, Anne Draffkorn (1998). "The Musical Instruments from Ur and Ancient Mesopotamian Music". Expedition. 40 (2): 12–19. Retrieved 29 December 2015.
- Crickmore, Leon (2010). "New Light on the Babylonian Tonal System" (PDF). In Dumbrill, Richard; Finkel, Irving (eds.). ICONEA 2008: Proceedings of the International Conference of Near Eastern Archaeomusicology. Vol. 24. London: Iconea Publications. pp. 11–22. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 January 2016. Retrieved 29 December 2015.
- Zhang, Juzhong; Harbottle, Garman; Wang, Changsui; Kong, Zhaochen (23 September 1999). "Oldest playable musical instruments found at Jiahu early Neolithic site in China". Nature. 401 (6751): 366–368. Bibcode:1999Natur.401..366Z. doi:10.1038/43865. PMID 16862110. S2CID 205033636.
- Meeùs, Nicolas (2001). "Keyboard." Grove Music Online. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.14944. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
- Dumbrill, Richard J. (1998). The Archaeomusicology of the Ancient Near East. London: Tadema Press. p. 18. The book title is of 2nd edition; the 1st edition was entitled The Musicology and Organology of the Ancient Near East.
- Clough, John (1979). "Aspects of Diatonic Sets", Journal of Music Theory 23:45–61.
- Franklin, John C. (2002). "Diatonic Music in Greece: a Reassessment of its Antiquity", Mnemosyne 56.1:669–702
- Gould, Mark (2000). "Balzano and Zweifel: Another Look at Generalised Diatonic Scales", Perspectives of New Music 38/2:88–105
- Ellen Hickmann, Anne D. Kilmer and Ricardo Eichmann, (ed.) Studies in Music Archaeology III, 2001, VML Verlag Marie Leidorf, Germany ISBN 3-89646-640-2.
- Johnson, Timothy (2003). Foundations of Diatonic Theory: A Mathematically Based Approach to Music Fundamentals. Key College Publishing. ISBN 1-930190-80-8.
- Kilmer, A. D. (1971) "The Discovery of an Ancient Mesopotamian Theory of Music'". Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 115:131–149.
- Kilmer, Anne Draffkorn; Crocker, Richard L.; Brown, Robert R.: Sounds from Silence: Recent Discoveries in Ancient Near Eastern Music, Volume 1. 1976, Bit Enki Publications, Berkeley, California. OCLC 463314183
- David Rothenberg (1978). "A Model for Pattern Perception with Musical Applications Part I: Pitch Structures as order-preserving maps", Mathematical Systems Theory 11:199–234