Conflict of contract laws

In the conflict of laws, the validity and effect of a contract with one or more foreign law elements will be decided by reference to the so-called "proper law" of the contract.

History[edit]

In England, until the middle of the 19th century, the courts generally applied the lex loci contractus as the proper law.^[1]^[2]

Proper law[edit]

Express selection[edit]

In England, as of 1 October 1983,^[3] when the parties express a clear intention in a choice-of-law clause, this is generally the proper law.^[4]

Implied selection[edit]

In England, as of 1 October 1983,^[3] when the parties have not used express words, their intention may be inferred from the terms and nature of the contract, and from the general circumstances of the case.^[5]

Closest and most real connection[edit]

In Mount Albert Borough Council v Australasian etc Assurance Society Ltd, it was held that, in default, the court has to impute an intention by asking, as just and reasonable persons, which law the parties ought to, or would, have intended to nominate if they had thought about it when they were making the contract.^[6] But see The Assunzione.^[7]

Dépeçage[edit]

Some legal systems provide that a contract may be governed by more than one law. This concept is referred to as dépeçage.^[8]

References[edit]

^ J H C Morris, The Conflict of Laws, Third Edition, Stevens and Sons, London, 1984, ISBN 0-420-46890-0, p 266.
^ This approach was also generally adopted in Scotland: A E Anton, Private International Law: A treatise from the standpoint of Scots law, (Scottish Universities Law Institute), W Green & Son, Edinburgh, 1967, reprinted 1970, p 185. As to contract in conflict of laws in Scotland generally, see further the rest of chapter 7 ("Contract").
^ ^a ^b J H C Morris, The Conflict of Laws, Third Edition, Stevens and Sons, London, 1984, p vii
^ J H C Morris, The Conflict of Laws, Third Edition, Stevens and Sons, London, 1984, ISBN 0-420-46890-0, p 270.
^ J H C Morris, The Conflict of Laws, Third Edition, Stevens and Sons, London, 1984, ISBN 0-420-46890-0, p 275.
^ Mount Albert Borough Council v Australasian etc Assurance Society Ltd [1938] AC 224 at 240. J H C Morris, The Conflict of Laws, Third Edition, Stevens and Sons, London, 1984, ISBN 0-420-46890-0, p 276.
^ The Assunzione [1954] P 150 at 175. As to the effect this case, see J H C Morris, The Conflict of Laws, Third Edition, Stevens and Sons, London, 1984, ISBN 0-420-46890-0, p 276, footnote 60.
^ J H C Morris, The Conflict of Laws, Third Edition, Stevens and Sons, London, 1984, ISBN 0-420-46890-0, p 528.

Further reading[edit]

Nikitas Hatzimihail. "Contracts" Preclassical Conflict of Laws. Cambridge University Press. 2021. Chapter 9.3.1. Page 285 et seq.
Wolff, "Hong Kong's Conflict of Contract Laws: Quo Vadis?" (2010) 6 Journal of Private International Law 465
Tetley and Wilkins. International Conflict of Laws: Common, Civil, and Maritime. International Shipping Publications. 1994. Page 237. See also passim. Google
Lectures on the Conflict of Laws and International Contracts. University of Michigan Law School. 1951. Passim. Google
Petar Sarcevic (ed). International Contracts and Conflicts of Laws: A Collection of Essays. Graham & Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff. 1990. Passim. Google
Geoffrey Chevalier Cheshire. International Contracts. Jackson, Son & Company, printers to the University. Glasgow. 1948. Passim. Google
Henri Battifol. Les Conflits des Lois en Matière des Contrats: Etude de droit international privé comparé. Recueil Sirey. Paris. 1938.
Adrian Briggs. "Contracts". The Conflict of Laws. Second Edition. Oxford University Press. 2008. Chapter 5. Page 153 et seq.
Christopher M V Clarkson and Jonathan Hill. "Contractual obligations". The Conflict of Laws. Fourth Edition. Oxford University Press. 2011. Chapter 4. Page 203 et seq.
J H C Morris. "Contracts" The Conflict of Laws. Second Edition. Stevens and Sons. 1980. Chapter 13. Page 209 et seq.
Dicey. "Contracts: General Rules" and "Particular Contracts". A Digest of the Law of England with Reference to the Conflict of Laws. London. 1896. Chapters 24 and 25. Page 540 et seq.
Joseph Story and Isaac F Redfield. "Foreign Contracts". Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws. Sixth Edition. Little, Brown and Company. 1865. Page 290 et seq.

This article about a contract law topic is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[1] J H C Morris, The Conflict of Laws, Third Edition, Stevens and Sons, London, 1984, ISBN 0-420-46890-0, p 266.

[2] This approach was also generally adopted in Scotland: A E Anton, Private International Law: A treatise from the standpoint of Scots law, (Scottish Universities Law Institute), W Green & Son, Edinburgh, 1967, reprinted 1970, p 185. As to contract in conflict of laws in Scotland generally, see further the rest of chapter 7 ("Contract").

[Morris1984preface-3] J H C Morris, The Conflict of Laws, Third Edition, Stevens and Sons, London, 1984, p vii

[4] J H C Morris, The Conflict of Laws, Third Edition, Stevens and Sons, London, 1984, ISBN 0-420-46890-0, p 270.

[5] J H C Morris, The Conflict of Laws, Third Edition, Stevens and Sons, London, 1984, ISBN 0-420-46890-0, p 275.

[6] Mount Albert Borough Council v Australasian etc Assurance Society Ltd [1938] AC 224 at 240. J H C Morris, The Conflict of Laws, Third Edition, Stevens and Sons, London, 1984, ISBN 0-420-46890-0, p 276.

[7] The Assunzione [1954] P 150 at 175. As to the effect this case, see J H C Morris, The Conflict of Laws, Third Edition, Stevens and Sons, London, 1984, ISBN 0-420-46890-0, p 276, footnote 60.

[8] J H C Morris, The Conflict of Laws, Third Edition, Stevens and Sons, London, 1984, ISBN 0-420-46890-0, p 528.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]