2021–2022 Dutch cabinet formation

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Expected parliamentary leaders meeting the day after the election to discuss the formation

A process of cabinet formation took place following the 2021 Dutch general election, leading to the formation of the Fourth Rutte cabinet in 2022. The coalition consisted of People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), Democrats 66 (D66), Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA) and Christian Union (CU), the same parties that formed the preceding Third Rutte cabinet. At 299 days, it was the longest formation in Dutch history.

At the start of the formation, notes from the scouts, that included the text "position Omtzigt, function elsewhere", became public. VVD leader and demissionary prime minister Mark Rutte turned out – after first denying it – to have spoken about CDA MP Pieter Omtzigt. This led to distrust of Rutte among those parties that might otherwise be inclined to cooperate with him. Informateur Herman Tjeenk Willink was then instructed to look at how confidence could be restored and how a cabinet could be formed.

In the following months, informateur Mariëtte Hamer looked for a majority coalition consisting of a combination of VVD, D66, CDA, PvdA, GroenLinks (GL) and CU. However, without substantive negotiations, blockades were put up between these parties. Informateur Johan Remkes then looked for a minority coalition or extra-parliamentary cabinet, but these options were also blocked. Because of the impasse, D66 decided to lift the blockade against a majority coalition with the ChristenUnie. Led by informateurs Remkes and Wouter Koolmees, VVD, CDA, D66 and CU then negotiated. On 15 December 2021, these parties presented a coalition agreement. Under the leadership of formateur Rutte, a search was then made for ministers, who were sworn in on 10 January 2022.

Background[edit]

The third Rutte cabinet resigned in January 2021 because of a report on the Dutch childcare benefits scandal. One of the driving forces behind the exposure of the scandal was CDA MP Pieter Omtzigt. Omtzigt was candidate in the CDA party leader election of 2020, but narrowly lost to Hugo de Jonge. Omtzigt became running mate, being placed second on the candidacy list. When De Jonge withdrew as party leader, the party board chose Wopke Hoekstra as party leader. The opposition he had encountered led to a burn-out, as a result of which Omtzigt was already at home before the elections without being replaced.

As the election of March 2021 took place during the COVID-19 pandemic, parties wanted a short cabinet formation.[1] Leader of the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) Mark Rutte even suggested dividing the formation into two parts, with parties first collectively working on a recovery plan for the Covid crisis.[2]

During the campaign, some parties expressed preferences for coalition partners. Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA) and VVD ruled out cooperation with the radical-right parties Party for Freedom (PVV) and Forum for Democracy (FvD). VVD explicitly indicated that it wanted to govern with CDA.[3] GroenLinks proposed that the progressive parties D66 and PvdA should join a coalition together, but both parties rejected this.[4] GroenLinks and PvdA indicated that they only wanted to join cabinet if the other party or the Socialist Party (SP) also joined. Contrary to previous elections, SP no longer ruled out cooperation with the VVD and did not impose another left-wing party in the cabinet as a condition.[5] After the appointment of party leader Esther Ouwehand, Party for the Animals (PvdD) was also open to joining a cabinet.[6] During the campaign, coalition partners D66 and Christian Union (CU) emphasized their differences regarding medical-ethical questions, making cooperation between those parties unlikely.[7]

Election results[edit]

Composition of the House of Representatives throughout the cabinet formation:
  BIJ1: 1
  Volt: 3
  Denk: 3
  Den Haan (ex-50+): 1
  GL: 8
  SP: 9
  PvdD: 6
  PvdA: 9
  D66: 24
  CU: 5
  SGP: 3
  VVD: 34
  CDA: 14
  Omtzigt (ex-CDA): 1
  BBB: 1
  JA21: 3
  FvD: 5
  Groep Van Haga (ex-FvD): 2
  Ephraim (ex-Groep Van Haga,
ex-FvD): 1
  PVV: 17
Main article: 2021 Dutch general election

At the election the liberal parties VVD and D66 both gained seats, with D66 becoming the second-largest party and VVD maintaining its position as largest party. For the first time since the 1998 Dutch general election a sitting cabinet won seats in the general election.[8] FvD gained the most seats, growing from two to eight seats.[9] PvdD was the only other sitting party that managed to grow, with one seat. Four parties (Volt, JA21, BIJ1 and Farmer–Citizen Movement (BBB)) managed to join parliament for the first time. All other parties lost seats or remained the same. Seventeen parties were elected; this was the highest number since the 1918 Dutch general election.[10] Because of this fragmentation, a majority cabinet had to consist of at least four parties. With 28 seats, the radical-right (JA21, PVV and FVD) achieved the best result ever.[11] The traditional left parties (GroenLinks, PvdA, and SP) were smaller than ever with a combined 26 seats.[12]

Scouts Jorritsma and Ollongren[edit]

Scouts Annemarie Jorritsma (VVD) and Kajsa Ollongren (D66) receiving their assignment from President of the House Khadija Arib

On 18 March, the expected seventeen parliamentary leaders met to discuss the formation, and to select a scout to investigate which coalitions would be possible.[13] In addition to the custom that the largest party to provides the scout, D66 insisted on a second scout from their party. Subsequently, VVD Senate leader Annemarie Jorritsma and D66 Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations Kajsa Ollongren were appointed as scouts.[14] On 22 and 23 March the scouts interviewed expected parliamentary leaders on their coalition preferences.[15]

Coalition preferences[edit]

Coalition preferences among voters
# EenVandaag (18 March 2021)[16] Seats
1 VVD + D66 + CDA + ChristianUnion 78
2 VVD + D66 + CDA + Volt 76
3 VVD + D66 + CDA + PvdA 82
4 VVD + PVV + CDA + FVD + JA21 77
5 VVD + D66 + PvdA + SP + GroenLinks 84
# Peil.nl (28 March 2021)[17]
Seats
1 VVD + D66 + CDA + JA21[a] 76
2 VVD + D66 + PvdA + SP + GroenLinks[b] 84
3 VVD + CDA + D66 + PVV 90
4 VVD + D66 + CDA + ChristianUnion 78
5 VVD + D66 + CDA + PvdA 82

VVD and D66 had different coalition preferences. VVD leader Mark Rutte wanted to "look seriously" at a center-right coalition with D66, CDA and JA21.[18] However, D66-leader Kaag found collaboration with JA21 "difficult to imagine" and preferred a progressive coalition, without naming parties. Collaboration with one of the left-wing progressive parties, on the other hand, was only an option for Rutte after considering CU.[19]

A number of parties were open to cabinet participation. PVV leader Geert Wilders said that a right-wing coalition of VVD, CDA, PVV, FVD and JA21 should be investigated,[20] but this was ruled out by VVD. JA21-leader Joost Eerdmans supported Rutte's wish to form a right-wing cabinet of VVD, D66, CDA and JA21.[21] Lilianne Ploumen said PvdA was open to cabinet participation, provided that SP or GroenLinks also joined.[22] GroenLinks-leader Klaver was also open to government participation in an "as progressive as possible cabinet". PvdD leader Esther Ouwehand also argued for a cabinet that was as green and progressive as possible.[23]

Most other parties were hesitant about joining a cabinet at this stage for various reasons. CDA-leader Wopke Hoekstra said he had no desire to join a "liberal block", referring to VVD and D66.[18] As the tenth political group in terms of seats, CU-leader Gert-Jan Segers considered it strange if negotiations started with CU. SP-leader Lilian Marijnissen thought that coalition participation was not obvious given the electoral defeat.[24] Although FVD leader Thierry Baudet indicated on election evening that cabinet participation was possible,[25] he no longer expected this after talking to the scouts.[24] Although there was speculation about cabinet participation by newcomer Volt, party leader Laurens Dassen was cautious about this.[26] The other groups, with three or fewer seats, all indicated that cabinet participation was not an option for them.[21]

The scouts also spoke with President of the Senate Jan Anthonie Bruijn. He indicated that a majority in the Senate was 'preferable', but added that in recent years it had become apparent that a government can still succeed in realizing its legislative agenda in the absence of such a majority. Of the proposed coalitions, only the combination of VVD, D66, CDA, PvdA and GroenLinks had a majority in the Senate.

"Position Omtzigt, function elsewhere"[edit]

The notes that were accidentally photographed including the text "positie Omtzigt, functie elders" (English: "position Omtzigt, function elsewhere")

From the start, the scouts considered CDA pivotal within the formation. According to them, Omtzigt's position was a circumstance that could hinder coalition participation. They brought this up in a conversation with President of the House of Representatives Khadija Arib on 19 March. They indicated that they found the deadline of 30 March unfeasible. They thought it would be best to wait until the official results of the elections would be known on 26 March, which would show whether Omtzigt had more preference votes than party leader Hoekstra (which turned out not to be the case[27]). Jorritsma called Omtzigt's position a problem for coalition formation and 'untenable'. Arib did not agree to the request, because she thought it was inappropriate to talk about people in the scouting phase. The content of this conversation was not mentioned in the scouts' final report and only revealed a year and a half after the formation.[28]

On 25 March, Rutte and Kaag were due to hold a second meeting with the scouts separately.[29] However, after arriving at Binnenhof, where the meetings were to take place, Ollongren learned that she had tested positive for COVID-19 and had to go into quarantine.[30] On the way to her car, Ollongren's notes about the formation were photographed by an ANP photographer. Among other things, it read: "position Omtzigt, function elsewhere" (Dutch: "positie Omtzigt, functie elders").[31] An hour and a half after the notes were leaked, Jorritsma and Ollongren resigned as scouts.[32]

Debate about leaked notes[edit]

Several party leaders insisted on a debate about the leaked notes.[33] Also on behalf of Kaag, Rutte indicated that same day that neither of them had said anything about Omtzigt in their conversations. In the same interview, Rutte indicated that the scouts could not be summoned for debate, because they had already resigned.[34] Arib therefore asked Jorritsma and Ollongren as private persons to explain the notes, to which both agreed.[35]

Just before the debate on the 1 April, it appeared from the published interview reports that Rutte had spoken about Omtzigt, specifically about a possible ministerial position. Rutte indicated that he had no memory of this. During this debate it also emerged that Rutte had heard "via-via" as early as 7.30 in the morning, a few hours before the other parliamentary leaders, that the notes probably stated that he had spoken about Omtzigt. During the debate, Rutte refused to reveal who had notified him.[36] A motion of no confidence against Rutte as prime minister was rejected along the lines of the demissionary cabinet (77 against, 72 in favour).[37][38] A motion of censure against Rutte as parliamentary leader, on the other hand, was supported by all parties except the VVD.[39]

After the debate and the vote, SP and CU ruled out cooperation with VVD as long as Rutte was in charge.[40] The youth parties of D66, CDA, PvdA, PvdD, GL and DENK encouraged their parent parties to do the same.[41] Polls immediately after the debate also showed that 60% of voters did not want their party to enter into a coalition with VVD led by Rutte.[42][43]

Scouts Van Ark and Koolmees[edit]

Scouts Tamara van Ark (VVD) and Wouter Koolmees (D66) receiving their assignment from President of the House Khadija Arib.

After Ollongren and Jorritsma resigned, the ministers Tamara van Ark (VVD) and Wouter Koolmees (D66) were appointed as scouts on 25 March.[44] At the request of House of Representatives, they delayed meetings until after the debate with the scouts who had resigned. During this debate, however, the House passed a motion to request a new independent scout.[45] A day later on 2 April, Koolmees and Van Ark officially resigned.[46]

Informateur Tjeenk Willink[edit]

Informateur Herman Tjeenk Willink (PvdA) receiving his assignment from President of the House Vera Bergkamp (who succeeded Arib in that role on 7 April)

Herman Tjeenk Willink was appointed informateur for three weeks on 6 April, a role he had fulfilled five times before.[47] In the first week he held talks with the parliamentary leaders, this time the smaller parties first.[48] As a period of rest, he did not invite parliamentary leaders in the second week, but among others Nationale Ombudsman Reinier van Zutphen [nl] and chair of the Social and Economic Council Mariëtte Hamer.[49] In the weekend, Segers retracted his exclusion of cooperation with Rutte, but nevertheless preferred opposition.[50] In the invitation to parliamentary leaders for meetings in the third week, Tjeenk Willink indicated that more time had to be taken for the formation, but that a recovery plan for the corona crisis had to be worked out quickly.[51] Farid Azarkan (DENK), Wilders and Eerdmans were critical of this approach, which no longer was about the (lack of) trust in Rutte.[52]

Mutual trust was again under pressure after, according to RTL Nieuws, a Council of Ministers decided at the end of 2019 to deliberately provide the House of Representatives with incomplete information about the childcare benefits scandal.[53] Parliamentary leaders Rutte, Kaag and Hoekstra had attended the Council of Ministers as ministers.[54] Rutte indicated that "nothing inappropriate" had happened and the Council of Ministers decided to release the minutes.[55] During the debate on 29 April, the demissionary cabinet survived a motion of no confidence.[56]

Tjeenk Willink had decided to wait until after this debate to present his final report, which he handed over on 30 April. In his report he indicated that the substantive formation could start.[57][58] According to Tjeenk Willink, only BIJ1, PVV and SP explicitly ruled out governing with Rutte.[59] Polls published around the time of the debate with Tjeenk Willink on 12 May also showed that fewer voters ruled out a coalition with Rutte.[60][61]

Informateur Hamer[edit]

Informateur Mariëtte Hamer (PvdA) receiving her assignment from President of the House Vera Bergkamp

Scouting[edit]

After the debate with Tjeenk Willink on 12 May, SER-chairman Mariëtte Hamer was nominated as informateur by Kaag and Rutte, which was approved by the House of Representatives.[62] Her task was to first work towards recovery and transition policy after the corona crisis. Only after that, according to the motion, did she have to look for a coalition to form a government.[63]

Like her predecessors, she invited the - after a split 18 - parliamentary leaders for a meeting on 17 and 18 May. Although the discussions were largely substantive, they were also asked about coalition preferences.[64] Kaag expressed for the first time a preference for a specific coalition, consisting of VVD, CDA, D66, PvdA and GL.[65]

Between the discussions with the group leaders, Hamer had discussions with a total of 28 representatives on specific topics. These included youth organisations, representatives of the cultural sector and mayors.[66][67][68]

In the last week of her assignment, Hamer focused on the search for a coalition.[69] That week, Hamer received the parliamentary leaders of VVD, D66, CDA, PvdA, GL and CU in varying combinations. Hoekstra reacted reluctantly to Kaag's coalition preference for VVD, D66 and CDA, supplemented by two left-wing parties PvdA and GL.[70] Voters of VVD and CDA also reacted negatively to this coalition in opinion polls.[71][72] Ploumen and Klaver, however, repeated that they would only join a cabinet together.[70] The other option discussed, continuation of the sitting coalition, was held off by Segers.[73] At the end of the week, Hamer indicated that she needed more time than the original 6 June deadline. She said there were not many substantive differences, but the parties nevertheless did not want to work together in a cabinet.[74]

The following week, Hamer brought the conflicting parties together again, but again this did not lead to a possible coalition.[75] On 10 June, an internal document was leaked in which Omtzigt criticized his party, saying he felt unsafe.[76][77] As a result of the leak, Omtzigt indicated two days later that he would leave the CDA and continue as an independent MP.[78] The coalitions of VVD, D66 and CDA, supplemented by JA21 or Volt, previously mentioned by Hoekstra, would therefore no longer have a majority.[79] At the end of that week, Hamer concluded that the formation was at an impasse. During a joint conversation with VVD, D66, CDA, PvdA, GL and CU, she urged the parties to come to a breakthrough during the weekend.[80]

When the impasse was not broken after this weekend, Hamer suggested that Kaag and Rutte write the basis of a coalition agreement together, which other parties could then join at a later stage. On 22 June she presented her final report with that recommendation.[81]

Start of coalition agreement between VVD and D66[edit]

During the debate on Hamer's report on 23 June, the House agreed to her proposal. In the following weeks, representatives of VVD and D66, led by Hamer, negotiated in silence. VVD MPs Sophie Hermans and Mark Harbers negotiated with their D66 colleagues Rob Jetten and Steven van Weyenberg.[82]

GroenLinks MPs Corinne Ellemeet and Jesse Klaver at a meeting with members, discussing the cooperation with the Labour Party.

On 17 August, the document was shared with CDA, PvdA, GL and CU. A day before the document was shared, Kaag indicated in the Algemeen Dagblad that she was still against coalition with CU.[83] On 20 August, Ploumen and Klaver announced that they wanted to join as one delegation during the cabinet negotiations.[84] At party meetings a week later, members supported this approach and governing with VVD was not ruled out either.[85] However, VVD and CDA indicated that this cooperation was insufficient reason to negotiate with the two parties.[86]

On 2 September, Hamer presented her final report.[87] In the report she recommended that a new informateur investigates a minority coalition, for which she made several proposals. The House debated the report on 7 September.

Informateur Remkes[edit]

During the last debate with Hamer, a VVD motion was passed to appoint Johan Remkes as informateur. His assignment was to explore a minority coalition, in line with the recommendation of Hamer.[88]

On 15 September, the House of Representatives held a debate on the evacuation from Afghanistan. During the debate, motions of censure were tabled against the Minister of Foreign Affairs Sigrid Kaag and the Minister of Defense Ank Bijleveld (CDA). These were supported by the entire opposition and eventually also by CU. Kaag concluded that she therefore had to resign but remained on as party leader and negotiator for the formation. After initially staying on, Bijleveld also resigned the next day under political pressure. From 18 to 19 September, the negotiators from VVD, D66 and CDA met at the De Zwaluwenberg estate in Hilversum together with Remkes.[89] However, this did not lead to a breakthrough, partly because of the events the week before.[90]

The formation was officially halted from 20–26 September due to Prinsjesdag. During this period, the VVD and CDA jointly wrote a draft coalition agreement, dated 26 September. The goal of this draft was to convince D66 to form a minority government with them. According to the two parties, this was at the initiative of Remkes, while Remkes said it was on their own initiative. The existence and content of this document only became known after Segers left it on a train and it ended up at de Volkskrant in November.[91] However, on September 26, Kaag said she was willing to "lift our political blockade", referring to the ChristianUnion.[92] A day later, the negotiators from VVD, CDA and D66 met with Remkes for more than ten hours. Remkes concluded from this that there was no possibility for a minority cabinet, and therefore decided to investigate the possibilities for an extraparliamentary cabinet.[93]

Sigrid Kaag, accompanied by Rob Jetten, announcing on 30 September that D66 is willing to negotiate with ChristianUnion.

On 29 September, discussions were held with VVD, D66, CDA, PvdA, GroenLinks, ChristianUnion, SGP, Volt and Liane den Haan about an extra-parliamentary cabinet. This option did not receive sufficient support. After the formation Segers learned that VVD and CDA around that time were considering entering into discussions with PvdA and GroenLinks.[94] However, D66 decided to lift the blockade against the coalition with ChristianUnion in order to prevent new elections. Remkes presented his report the following day, in which he advised starting negotiations between VVD, D66, CDA and ChristianUnion.

Informateurs Remkes and Koolmees[edit]

President of the House Vera Bergkamp (middle) receives report from informateurs Wouter Koolmees (left) and Johan Remkes (right).

On 5 October, the House of Representatives held a debate on Remkes' report. During the debate, a motion was passed to appoint Johan Remkes and Wouter Koolmees as informateurs. For the duration of the formation, Koolmees relinquished his duties as Minister of Social Affairs and Employment, but did not resign.[95] The substantive negotiations between the parties mainly took place between Sophie Hermans (VVD), Rob Jetten (D66), Pieter Heerma (CDA) and Carola Schouten (CU).

Presentation of agreement by Gert-Jan Segers (CU), Sigrid Kaag (D66), Mark Rutte (VVD) and Wopke Hoekstra (CDA).

On 13 December, the spokesman for the cabinet formation announced that they had reached a negotiator's agreement. That document was then sent to the four parliamentary groups.[96] After their approval, the agreement was presented on 15 December.[97]

Formateur Rutte[edit]

Formateur Mark Rutte (VVD) receives assignment from President of the House Vera Berkamp

After the debate about the coalition agreement and the report of informateurs Koolmees and Remkes, a motion was passed to appoint Rutte as formateur.[98] The cabinet posts and portfolio distribution were determined with the other party leaders. The party leaders then nominated cabinet members. These were checked by, among others, the General Intelligence and Security Service and the Tax and Customs Administration. According to De Telegraaf, none of the nominated cabinet members were dropped after the checks. From January 3, Rutte held talks with the candidates.

During the search for cabinet members, the parties aimed for fifty percent women.[99] In the end, ten of the twenty ministers were women, the highest proportion until then, and four of the nine State Secretaries. A cabinet has also never had so many ministers with a migration background.[c] Franc Weerwind was also the first black minister since 1905.[100]

Following the talks, the nominated cabinet members met on 8 January 2022 for the constitutive deliberation (Dutch: Constituerend beraad). Afterwards, Rutte presented his final report to the President of the House. On January 10, 2022, Fourth Rutte cabinet was sworn in.[101]

Aftermath[edit]

The government policy statement was made in the House of Representatives on 18 January. A vote of no confidence, tabled during the ensuing debate, was supported only by PVV and FVD. A month later, the Senate debated the government policy statement. The vote of no confidence there was only supported by the PVV and the Otten faction. The fact that the coalition did not have a majority in the Senate immediately turned out to be a problem when the opposition passed motions against parts of the coalition agreement.[102]

President of the House Vera Bergkamp had an evaluation carried out under the chairmanship of Professor Carla van Baalen [nl]. This led to eleven recommendations, including the introduction of deadlines for informateurs, observing the confidentiality of the formation interviews, keeping the exploratory phase "small" and clarifying the role of the House of Representatives in directing cabinet formations.[103]

The formation – and particularly its length – was one of the causes of declining public confidence in politics according to The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.[104]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Ranked sixth out of ten for D66-voters.
  2. ^ Ranked last out of ten for VVD-voters.
  3. ^ Dilan Yeşilgöz-Zegerius, Franc Weerwind and Gunay Uslu.

Sources[edit]

  • Van Baalen, Carla; Van Kessel, Alexander; Bovend'Eert, Paul; Van Twist, Mark (23 February 2023). Evaluatie kabinetsformatie 2021/22 [Evaluation cabinet formation 2021/22] (pdf) (in Dutch). Centrum voor Parlementaire Geschiedenis. Retrieved 23 February 2023.

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Rutte pleit voor snelle formatie met oog op coronacrisis". Nederlands Dagblad (in Dutch). 4 March 2021. Retrieved 21 April 2021.
  2. ^ den Hartog, Tobias; Soest, Hans van (12 March 2021). "Rutte wil herstelplan corona met álle andere politieke partijen: geen bezuinigingen, meer ic-plekken". Algemeen Dagblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 21 April 2021.
  3. ^ Markus, Niels; Zuidervaart, Bart (15 March 2021). "Bijna alle partijen willen regeren, toch dreigt een moeizame formatie". Trouw (in Dutch). Retrieved 21 April 2021.
  4. ^ Herderscheê, Gijs; Korteweg, Ariejan (19 February 2021). "Alweer vroegtijdig gesneuveld: de progressieve samenwerking tussen GroenLinks, D66 en PvdA". Volkskrant (in Dutch). Retrieved 21 April 2021.
  5. ^ "Marijnissen gekozen tot lijsttrekker SP: 'Deze keer pakken we kans om te regeren'". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 20 June 2020. Retrieved 21 April 2021.
  6. ^ Kammer, Claudia; Verlaan, Jos (10 December 2020). "'We staan open voor een groen en progressief kabinet'". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  7. ^ "ChristenUnie: medisch-ethische kwesties wel in formatie bespreken". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 15 March 2021. Retrieved 3 June 2021.
  8. ^ Heringa, Aalt Willem (21 April 2021). "Hoe demissionair is het huidige kabinet nu eigenlijk?". Montesquieu Instituut (in Dutch). Retrieved 1 June 2021.
  9. ^ "Dit zijn de winnaars en de verliezers van de verkiezingen". RTL Nieuws (in Dutch). 18 March 2021. Retrieved 1 June 2021.
  10. ^ "Waarschijnlijk 17 partijen in de Tweede Kamer, even hoog aantal als recordjaar 1918". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 18 March 2021. Retrieved 18 March 2021.
  11. ^ Valk, Guus (18 March 2021). "Radicaal-rechts is voor een grotere groep kiezers aantrekkelijk geworden". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 1 June 2021.
  12. ^ Lievisse Adriaanse, Mark; Rusman, Floor (18 March 2021). "De verlinksing van rechts speelt links parten". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 1 June 2021.
  13. ^ "Partijleiders voor het eerst bijeen na verkiezingen: 'Nou, gefeliciteerd man!'". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 18 March 2021. Retrieved 18 March 2021.
  14. ^ "Niet één, maar twee verkenners in kabinetsformatie: Jorritsma (VVD) en Ollongren (D66)". Het Parool (in Dutch). 18 March 2021. Retrieved 20 April 2021.
  15. ^ "Verkenners gaan de stemming peilen bij de fractievoorzitters". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 22 March 2021. Retrieved 22 March 2021.
  16. ^ Klapwijk, Petra (18 March 2021). "Kiezers VVD, CDA en ChristenUnie willen liefst door met huidige coalitie, kiezers van D66 niet". EenVandaag (in Dutch). Retrieved 20 April 2021.
  17. ^ "Versplinterde formatie". Peil.nl. 28 March 2021. Retrieved 20 April 2021.
  18. ^ a b "Rutte wil 'serieus kijken' naar JA21, Kaag noemt het 'moeilijk voorstelbaar'". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 22 March 2021. Retrieved 22 March 2021.
  19. ^ Kok, Laurens; Winterman, Peter (23 March 2021). "Rutte: Eerst formeren met JA21, dan ChristenUnie, daarna pas met links". Algemeen Dagblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 23 March 2021.
  20. ^ Borst, Thomas (22 March 2021). "Wilders pleit voor 'centrumrechts' kabinet met VVD, CDA, FVD en JA21". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 31 May 2021.
  21. ^ a b van Bekkum, Dylan (23 March 2021). "Eerdmans flirt terug, Segers wacht rustig af". Volkskrant (in Dutch). Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  22. ^ Aharouay, Lamyae. "Als vierde partij dan maar de PvdA?". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 23 March 2021.
  23. ^ Winterman, Peter; Hoedeman, Jan (23 March 2021). "ChristenUnie houdt de boot af: 'Heel vreemd om te gaan praten over kabinetsdeelname'". Algemeen Dagblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 23 March 2021.
  24. ^ a b "Formatieblog: Marijnissen staat open voor linkse koers, Baudet ziet voor FvD geen rol weggelegd in nieuw kabinet". Trouw (in Dutch). 23 March 2021. Retrieved 23 March 2021.
  25. ^ "Baudet wil initiatief nemen in formatie". De Telegraaf (in Dutch). 18 March 2021. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  26. ^ Borst, Thomas (23 March 2021). "Nieuwkomers spreken met verkenners: JA21 wil regeren, Volt terughoudend". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 31 May 2021.
  27. ^ "Ruim 342.000 stemmen voor Omtzigt, goed voor bijna vijf Kamerzetels". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 26 March 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2023.
  28. ^ Kleinnijenhuis, Jan; de Kruif, Irene; de Zoeten, Nynke (10 June 2023). "Verkenners zagen Omtzigt als probleem en risico voor de formatie". Nieuwsuur (in Dutch). Retrieved 10 June 2023.
  29. ^ Bureau Woordvoering Kabinetsformatie (23 March 2021). "Agenda verkenners Jorritsma en Ollongren - Nieuwsbericht - Kabinetsformatie". www.kabinetsformatie2021.nl (in Dutch). Retrieved 23 March 2021.
  30. ^ "Ollongren positief getest op corona, formatiegesprekken geannuleerd". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 25 March 2021. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
  31. ^ "Ollongren biedt inkijkje: 'functie elders' voor Omtzigt". De Telegraaf (in Dutch). 25 March 2021. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
  32. ^ "Verkenners Ollongren en Jorritsma stoppen na zichtbaar worden notities". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 25 March 2021. Retrieved 3 April 2021.
  33. ^ "Roep om debat na notitieblunder Ollongren". De Telegraaf (in Dutch). 25 March 2021. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
  34. ^ "Rutte: Kaag en ik hebben tijdens verkenning niets gezegd over CDA-Kamerlid Omtzigt". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 26 March 2021. Retrieved 26 March 2021.
  35. ^ "Kamermeerderheid, inclusief VVD en D66, wil debat uitgelekte notities". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 26 March 2021. Retrieved 27 March 2021.
  36. ^ "VVD-leider Mark Rutte kreeg 'via-via' informatie over notitie Pieter Omtzigt (CDA), Kamer eist dat hij bron prijsgeeft". Dagblad van het Noorden (in Dutch). 1 April 2021.
  37. ^ "Gewijzigde motie van de leden Wilders en Baudet over het opzeggen van het vertrouwen in de minister-president t.v.v. 35788-10". Tweede Kamer (in Dutch). 1 April 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2021.
  38. ^ "Rutte afgestraft in Kamer, maar wil vertrouwen terugwinnen". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 2 April 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2021.
  39. ^ Righton, Natalie; Pre, Raoul de (2 April 2021). "Ook coalitiepartijen steunen motie van afkeuring, Rutte stapt niet op". Het Parool (in Dutch). Retrieved 20 April 2021.
  40. ^ "Marijnissen (SP) roept partijen op: wees expliciet over Rutte-samenwerking". NU.nl (in Dutch). 4 April 2021. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  41. ^ "Jongerenpartijen willen geen nieuw kabinet met Rutte". Het Parool (in Dutch). 6 April 2021. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  42. ^ Klapwijk, Petra. "Onderzoek: 'debat mislukte verkenning en rol premier Rutte'" (PDF). EenVandaag (in Dutch). Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  43. ^ "En toen was alles anders (de electorale aardbeving van 1 April 2021)". Peil.nl (in Dutch). 4 April 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  44. ^ Lengton, Inge; Winther, Wouter de (25 March 2021). "Koolmees en Van Ark als nieuwe verkenners voorgedragen". De Telegraaf (in Dutch). Retrieved 25 March 2021.
  45. ^ "Nieuwe verkenner wordt 'gezaghebbend en onafhankelijk', met afstand tot Binnenhof". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 2 April 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2021.
  46. ^ Meerman, Ester (2 April 2021). "Van Ark en Koolmees stappen officieel op als verkenners". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 2 April 2021.
  47. ^ Alonso, Stéphane (6 April 2021). "Kamer stemt in met Tjeenk Willink als informateur". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 20 April 2021.
  48. ^ Bouma, Floor (7 April 2021). "Informateur Tjeenk Willink spreekt eerst met voorzitters kleine fracties". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 20 April 2021.
  49. ^ Aharouay, Lamyae (16 April 2021). "Warempel: de formatie ging deze week over de ínhoud". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 20 April 2021.
  50. ^ Koning, Petra de (17 April 2021). "Voorzichtig komt Segers terug op zijn uithaal naar Rutte". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  51. ^ "Informateur Tjeenk Willink: 'Formatie moet heel anders, coalitieakkoord op hoofdlijnen'". RTL Nieuws (in Dutch). 19 April 2021. Retrieved 21 April 2021.
  52. ^ Hofman, Flóri (20 April 2021). "Eerdmans en Wilders kritisch op werkwijze informateur Tjeenk Willink". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 21 April 2021.
  53. ^ "Geheime notulen: hoe de ministerraad steen en been klaagde over kritische Kamerleden". RTL Nieuws (in Dutch). 22 April 2021. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  54. ^ Aharouay, Lamyae; Koning, Petra de; Lievisse Adriaanse, Mark; Witt Wijnen, Philip de (22 April 2021). "Rutte III moet wéér wat uitleggen". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  55. ^ "Rutte over achterhouden informatie: 'Niets onoorbaars gebeurd'". RTL Nieuws (in Dutch). 21 April 2021. Retrieved 31 May 2021.
  56. ^ Aharouay, Lamyae; Koning, Petra de (29 April 2021). "Rutte toonde nederigheid, maar is het genoeg?". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 1 June 2021.
  57. ^ "Tjeenk Willink: inhoudelijke formatie kan beginnen". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 30 April 2021. Retrieved 30 April 2021.
  58. ^ "Eindverslag informateur Tjeenk Willink" (in Dutch). 30 April 2021. Retrieved 12 May 2021.
  59. ^ Rutten, Rik (30 April 2021). "Formatie mét Rutte kan door". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 30 April 2021.
  60. ^ "De Stemming 16-5-2021: FVD halveert". Peil.nl (in Dutch). 16 May 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  61. ^ Lubbe, Rozemarijn (12 May 2021). "Meerderheid kiezers is gedoe rond formatie zat: 'Problemen opzij schuiven en snel aan de slag voor nieuw kabinet'". EenVandaag (in Dutch). Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  62. ^ Alonso, Stéphane; Kammer, Claudia (12 May 2021). "Kamer stemt in met Hamer als informateur". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 12 May 2021.
  63. ^ "Motie van de leden Kaag en Rutte over aanwijzen van mevrouw M.I. Hamer tot informateur met als opdracht te onderzoeken welke partijen bereid zijn op basis van door de informateur onderzochte contouren van het te voeren beleid onderhandelingen over een coalitieakkoord te voeren". Tweede Kamer (in Dutch). 12 May 2021. Retrieved 29 May 2021.
  64. ^ Aharouay, Lamyae; Witt Wijnen, Philip de (18 May 2021). "Contouren nieuw kabinet lijken zowaar in zicht". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 19 May 2021.
  65. ^ Ouhajji, Majda (18 May 2021). "Kaag wil kabinet met VVD, PvdA, GroenLinks en CDA". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 1 June 2021.
  66. ^ "Jongeren willen ook bij vervolg formatie meepraten". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 20 May 2021. Retrieved 27 May 2021.
  67. ^ "Jongeren en cultuursector donderdag op gesprek bij informateur Hamer". Parlement.com (in Dutch).
  68. ^ Ouhajji, Majda (21 May 2021). "Bestuurders willen geld voor mobiliteit en het gemeentefonds". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 1 June 2021.
  69. ^ Kammer, Claudia (28 May 2021). "Informateur Hamer gaat volgende week op zoek naar coalitie". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 1 June 2021.
  70. ^ a b Wit Wijnen, Philip de (1 June 2021). "Haagse puzzel wordt complexer". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 1 June 2021.
  71. ^ Rademaker, Gijs (25 May 2021). "Het wordt slikken: niemand krijgt de coalitie die hij wil - weblog Gijs Rademaker". EenVandaag (in Dutch). Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  72. ^ "De Stemming 23-5-2021: formatie nog steeds zeer ingewikkeld". Peil.nl (in Dutch). 23 May 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  73. ^ "Rutte, Klaver, Ploumen: situatie in formatie is complex". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 2 June 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  74. ^ Borst, Thomas (4 June 2021). "Hamer heeft meer tijd nodig, maar ziet 'niet veel inhoudelijke verschillen'". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 4 June 2021.
  75. ^ Aharouay, Lamyae; de Witt Wijnen, Philip (10 June 2021). "De wie-met-wie-wil-regeren-vraag is eindelijk gesteld". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 12 June 2021.
  76. ^ Aharouay, Lamyae; Valk, Guus (10 June 2021). "CDA en formatie in zwaar weer door notitie Omtzigt". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 13 June 2021.
  77. ^ Omtzigt, Pieter (10 June 2021). "notitie Omtzigt" (PDF) (in Dutch). Retrieved 12 June 2023.
  78. ^ "Tweede Kamerlid Omtzigt stapt uit CDA en wil als zelfstandig Kamerlid verder". NOS Nieuws (in Dutch). 12 June 2021. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
  79. ^ Aharouay, Lamyae; de Koning, Petra (13 June 2021). "Met Omtzigts vertrek komen de hoop én vrees van het CDA uit". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 14 June 2021.
  80. ^ Kos, Jelmer (18 June 2021). "Informateur Hamer: formatie bevindt zich in impasse". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 21 June 2021.
  81. ^ Aharouay, Lamyae; de Koning, Petra (22 June 2021). "Advies Hamer: Rutte en Kaag schrijven samen verhaal voor nieuw kabinet". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 22 June 2021.
  82. ^ Boersema, Wendelmoet (1 July 2020). "Dit viertal zet voor Rutte en Kaag de nieuwe kabinetsplannen in de grondverf". Trouw (in Dutch). Archived from the original on 14 July 2021. Retrieved 14 July 2021.
  83. ^ van Laarhoven, Kasper (16 August 2021). "Kaag: D66 ziet samenwerking met ChristenUnie nog steeds niet zitten". NRC Handelsblad. Retrieved 29 August 2021.
  84. ^ Hendrickx, Frank; du Pré, Raoul (20 August 2021). "PvdA en GroenLinks willen als één delegatie onderhandelen in formatie, spreken van 'groeiend vertrouwen'". de Volkskrant (in Dutch). Retrieved 25 August 2021.
  85. ^ de Witt Wijnen, Philip; Rutten, Rik (28 August 2021). "GroenLinks en PvdA zetten samenwerking door, de bal ligt nu bij VVD en CDA". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 29 August 2021.
  86. ^ Ouhajji, Majda (31 August 2021). "VVD en CDA vinden coalitie van vijf partijen niet voor de hand liggen". NRC Handelsblad. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
  87. ^ "Vertrekkend informateur Hamer: situatie zorgelijk, nu minderheidskabinet". NOS. 2 September 2021.
  88. ^ "Motie van het lid Rutte over aanwijzen van de heer J.W. Remkes als informateur met als opdracht uitvoering te geven aan het advies in het verslag van informateur Hamer rekening houdend met in het verslag geschetste overwegingen". tweedekamer.nl (in Dutch). 7 September 2021. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
  89. ^ Heilbron, Belia (15 September 2021). "Remkes praat dit weekend met VVD, CDA en D66 op landgoed bij Hilversum". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 19 September 2021.
  90. ^ Kos, Jelmer (19 September 2021). "Remkes: geen doorbraak formatie, nieuwe gesprekken over 8 dagen". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 19 September 2021.
  91. ^ Bhikhie, Avinash; Natalie, Righton (17 November 2021). "VVD en CDA waren het al eens over concept-regeerakkoord, blijkt uit in trein gevonden document". de Volkskrant (in Dutch). Retrieved 17 November 2021.
  92. ^ Aharouay, Lamyae (26 September 2021). "Een meerderheidskabinet? Het lijkt ineens weer mogelijk". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 30 September 2021.
  93. ^ "Informateur Remkes: vorming minderheidskabinet is mislukt". NOS Nieuws (in Dutch). 28 September 2021. Retrieved 28 September 2021.
  94. ^ "Segers: VVD en CDA waren bij formatie tóch bereid te praten met GroenLinks en PvdA". Dit is de Dag. 6 October 2023. Retrieved 17 October 2023.
  95. ^ Aharouay, Lamyae; de Witt Wijnen, Philip (6 October 2021). "Informateur Koolmees is minister-af". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 18 October 2021.
  96. ^ "Na 271 dagen zijn ze eruit, onderhandelaars bereiken akkoord nieuw kabinet" (in Dutch). 13 December 2021. Retrieved 13 December 2021.
  97. ^ "Rutte: het heeft lang geduurd, maar het is een mooi akkoord".
  98. ^ "Formatie nieuw kabinet van start: Rutte bespreekt 'de poppetjes'". Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (in Dutch). 16 December 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2021.
  99. ^ Lengton, Inge; de Winther, Wouter (9 December 2021). "Bronnen: volgende week coalitieakkoord, partijen willen 'vrouwenquotum'". de Telegraaf. Retrieved 22 July 2022.
  100. ^ De Hingh, Valentijn (12 January 2022). "Rutte IV scoort op diversiteit. Maar het echte werk begint nu pas". De Correspondent. Retrieved 22 July 2022.
  101. ^ Meijer, Bart; Heavens, Louise (9 January 2022). "New Dutch finance minister Kaag tests positive for COVID-19 day before inauguration". Reuters. Retrieved 9 January 2022.
  102. ^ Van Baalen et al. 2023, p. 107.
  103. ^ Van Baalen et al. 2023, pp. 6–7.
  104. ^ "Burgerperspectieven 2021 | kwartaal 4" (pdf). Retrieved 10 January 2022.

External links[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2021–2022_Dutch_cabinet_formation&oldid=1212434200"